Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kontakt.io (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kontakt.io[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:SIRS. Has not been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Contested draftification. Jfire (talk) 04:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Computing, and New York. Jfire (talk) 04:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and strongly consider salting. Fails the notability guideline for companies – any apparently promising sources turned out to be trivial coverage for organisations. The creator likely merits a block as an advertising-only account, although they haven't edited in two weeks so it may be a moot point. – Teratix ₵ 11:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt. All coverage is WP:ORGTRIV – can't find anything that shows true notability. Dan • ✉ 06:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete none of the references meet GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 10:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.